The government plans to allow various extreme energy extraction techniques for gas and oil across the country.
Most of the proposals coming forward for Surrey are for acidisation.
Acidisation involves injecting solutions of acids along with other chemicals into wells. The objective is either to clean the well, or to create passageways through the rock along which oil or gas can flow. The industry divides acidising (or acidisation) broadly into three ‘tiers’. In increasing order of intensity:
- an acid wash is a weak acid solution that cleans the well bore at low pressure
- matrix acidising, injected at a pressure insufficient to fracture the rock, cleans and dissolves short pathways through the rock lying close to the wellbore
- acid fracking is done at pressure high enough to fracture the rock, creating longer pathways.
Read more about acidising:
- Environment Agency paper: Use of acid at oil and gas exploration and production sites
- Booklet by Keith Taylor MP: A guide to drilling, acidisation and fracking in the South East
- Frack Free Sussex website
Why are we concerned about acidisation?
Wells have been acidised in the Weald in decades gone by, barely regulated or monitored. What is proposed now is on a different scale.
- It threatens industrialisation of the countryside. One company, UK Oil & Gas (UKOG), has promised ‘back-to-back drilling of production wells’ across the Weald.
- Acidising uses much higher concentrations of chemicals than fracking. Matrix acidising and acid fracking fluids could contain up to 17 or 18% chemicals.
- Given the repetitive nature of the process, acidising may use a lot of water.
- With no precise definitions, scrutiny or monitoring, the industry can get away with downplaying their plans, calling everything an ‘acid wash’, or just a ‘stimulation technique’. At well-testing stage they may propose an acid wash when in truth they want to matrix acidise, in the knowledge that at production stage they will want to acidise more vigorously, at pressure.
- Acidising brings most of the negatives of fracking: traffic, road tankers, air pollution, flares, potential water pollution via spills, leaking wells and faults, processing plants, large volumes of toxic liquid waste, stress on communities.
- The vast majority of scientists are now agreed that the burning of fossil fuels is causing potentially catastropic climate change. The UK government and have others have made legally-binding climate change targets. The extraction of oil will make it much harder to meet these. Rather than extracting these difficult-to-extract fossil fuels, we need to switch investment to energy efficiency and renewable technologies.
What is fracking?
Other parts of the country face a threat from fracking. This is a process of injecting a lot of water is mixed with sand and chemicals, at high pressure, in order to crack the shale and so allow gas and/or oil to escape.
During the fracking process carbon, toxic chemicals and possibly even radioactive material are likely to escape during and/or after drilling activities. Harmful emissions threaten our air, our groundwater, our wildlife, our children, ourselves.
The chemical mix in the fracking fluid is required for ease of drilling and to dissolve or crack the shale. It can contains many chemicals, some of which are carcinogenic and associated with cancer of the cervix, the breast, the endocrine system or the uterus.
The large quantities of water used in the process has to be brought on site – thousands of gallons per frack, usually in tankers.
After injection, the fracking fluid will pick up additional chemicals from the bedrock as it travels back to the surface. Millions of gallons of contaminated water will therefore have to be disposed of but will be initially reused for drilling and then stored in silos or in open slurry ‘lagoons’.
Types and amounts of chemicals used will vary in accordance with the geological structure of the site.
The gas makes its way to the surface via the borehole. Most of it will be captured but enough will escape to generate flaring or contribute to our carbon footprint at a time when the UK has promised to reduce it. The UK has no viable carbon capture systems in place.
Once full fracking operations are under way any one site may have up to 40 wells, all needing huge amounts of water delivered by tankers 24/7. More tankers come to carry away drilling waste or slurry, and some tankers will come to transport the liberated gas to the main grid. Such high levels of traffic will put enormous pressure on roads and the environment.
Fully operational sites will also need to feed the extracted gas into the main grid. Most sites will construct pipelines. This will involve considerable amounts of earthworks further disrupting life for people and wildlife in rural and/or urban environments. People’s concern that swathes of countryside will become industrialised are very real.
The Government and shale gas industry denies that the technology is unsafe and blames pollution ‘incidents’ as examples of bad practice, rather than an inherently risky technique. Remembering the EXXON VALDEZ or DEEPWATER HORIZON disasters, who could now believe that the flow of fluids can be controlled once injected into the ground? Who will pay for damaged roads?
Operators sub-contract all aspects of operations. Operators are often shell companies which can easily be closed down creating difficulties when suing them for negligence (or worse).
How does the onshore oil and gas industry work?
The Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) is responsible for issuing licences to companies allowing them to explore for oil and gas. This is done in Rounds.
On August 18th 2015, the OGA released details of new onshore oil and gas licences issued under the 14th Round. You can see a list of the new licences on this page: http://drillordrop.com/could-your-area-be-fracked-under-the-new-oil-and-gas-licences/
The licences give the companies the right to explore for oil and gas in the licensed areas, but before they can do that they need planning permission too. The local planning authorities (in our case Surrey County Council) have to decide whether to allow the physical works (the access roads, fencing and buildings), while the Environment Agency and Health and Safety Executive have to judge whether the proposed activities are safe for the environment and the workers.
Small companies often gain exploration rights and then raise the money from private backers to undertake exploration works. If they strike a significant resource they usually get bought out by the major global players in the minerals industry and make a lot of money (or get tax concessions to cover losses).
There are a number of small players who have licences to exploit shale gas in Lancashire and Surrey. They try to attract further investment from small investors and private energy investment companies to undertake the first stages of drilling and testing. The aim is to sell it on to a larger player.